Guru Besar Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Adalah Sayyid Ahmad Khan
 |
| Sayyid Ahmad Khan [1817-1898] |
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, selain terpengaruh oleh Gerakan New Age Movement yang didorong oleh Madame Blavatsky yang, pada tahun 1850-an dan 1870-an ia mengunjungi Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ke India berulang kali. Baca Arikel sebelumnya DISINI.
Kesalahan orang-orang saat berdebat tentang Ahmadiyah adalah cuma terfokus pada klaim kenabian Ghulam Ahmad. Tawur habis-habisan di situ. Akibatnya tidak ada perhatian kepada berbagai penafsiran-penafsiran lainnya, yang mana orang-orang Ahmadiyah zaman Ghulam Ahmad sangat terpengaruh dengan pemikiran Sayyid Ahmad Khan, pembaharu Islam dari India yang juga pendiri perguruan Aligarh. Selain itu, pemikiran Ahmad Khan juga banyak mempengaruhi kaum intelektual lainnya di India pada masa itu.
“Sir” Syed Ahmed Khan (1817-1898)
By reading Syed Ahmed Khan’s view on Quran and Shariah one can easily conclude that he did not receive proper education in Shariah and he based his views mainly on his personal opinions and surrounding political environment in Indian subcontinent and his own personal political objectives. He openly rejected hadith (حديث) and Tafsir (تفسير). Instead he made Taweel (تعويل) and created his own interpretation of various Nus as he sees fit, often to please the British Masters. But as Allah (swt) says in Quran that if book written by Human you will find contradictions in it, hence, we find many huge contradictions in writing of Syed Ahmed Khan.
Ironically, while he blamed Ulema to make mockery of Hadith and Tafsir by mentioning mysterious things, but Syed Ahmed himself is biggest guilty of this act. His opinions are perhaps worst than any other, and his taweelat is a reminder of Batania sect (فرقة باطنية).
He openly made Taweel (create hidden meaning) to prove his wild opinions. In matters related to Iman and Ghaib (غيب) he denied most of it on pretext that it can’t be proven. He defined Angels as Quwat-Malakuti (قوى ملكوتي) and Devils as Quwat-Bahimi (قوى بهيمي) and denied their physical existence. He stated that true religion has nothing to do with Worldly affairs. Strangely, this unique Ilham (ااـهام) was only given to Syed Ahmed, and Allah (swt) forgot to mention all this wisdom to Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). He denied miracles, and hence denied all miracles associated to various Prophets, like Ibrahim was never put inside fire, and he termed Musa’s stick turning into snake as illusion. He denied that Isa (Jesus) was born without a father.
It was very typical of Syed Ahmed Khan that when he couldn’t explain Quran based on his own presumed Usool (rules), then he will declare that this is رويا (dream) and if it doesn’t fit into dream, then he make Taweel and change the meaning of original word to anything else to make his point. He denied that Jesus was given healing powers and when he gave live to death then death here means Kufr (كفر) and live here mean Iman (ايمان), so Jesus brought them from Kufr to Iman. Or when Allah (swt) showed Ibrahim how he brings dead birds back to live, it was Ibrahim’s dream, and Mohammad (pbuh) was taken to Mairaj (معراج) during his dream etc. He denied that army of Abraha (ابراهه) died after being attacked by birds, rather they died due to smallpox disease. He denied that in Badr Battle Allah swt sent angles to help the Prophet (pbuh). He also denied returning of Jesus.
One would like to ask Syed Ahmed that if for the sake of argument we take his opinion, then we have right to ask that what was stopping Allah (swt) to explain these historical events in same light as Syed Ahmed explains? If Syed Ahmed can explain it then so as Allah (swt). If Jesus was born with father, why would Allah (swt) not say it so in Quran, If Ibrahim was day dreaming, why would Allah (swt) not say so?, if Army of Abraha died of smallpox why would Allah mention that birds (أبابيل) stroked them with stone of hard clay.
Syed Ahmed had his own version of Tawheed. He declared that those who do not believe in God at all are not mushrik (مشرك) and will still go to paradise. He stated that those who do not have religion also have a religion and that is also Islam.
Similarly, he created his own version of fiqh. He denied Nasih and Mansookh (ناسخ و منسوخ) and also denied hadith. He claimed that joining salah (جمع بين الصلاتين) means we can do three daily prayers instead of five. He claimed that facing towards Kaba is not necessary. He considered Ahram (احرام) a barbaric dress of uncivilized times that Mohammad (pbuh) continued in their remembrance. He also denied magic and said word Sahr (سحر) in Quran means jahiliya (جاهليه) of Arabs as they use to believe in magic and such belief was jahiliya (جاهليه). He denied that religion (deen) has any role in worldly affairs. He stated that Haram Riba (ربا) is only when taken from poor people, and stated that taking Riba from riches or well off is not haram, neither it is haram to taken Riba in affairs of state and society, and in general trade.
In Indian subcontinents, there are many opinions about Syed Ahmed Khan. Some in Pakistan considers him pioneer of two nation theory, while other in India considers him pioneer of universalism or global nation. Main reason for such vast variety of opinion on his personality is that his writing that span over sixty or more years contains his personal opinions at a point in time and he continuously changed with time.
This is also true that in Indian sub continents various religions segments were involved in extreme Bidda (بدعات) and they had strange mysterious habits and cultures in various religious circles that have no roots in Islamic teaching. While Syed Ahmed Khan rightfully pointed out many of such mystic activities, he himself fell into other extreme. We acknowledge that many religious circles openly practice mysticism and have large blind following, but this is not a justification of mutilating the meaning and understanding of Quran and join the other extreme. Syed Ahmed justified his Taweelat (تعويلات) by presenting Bidda (بدعات) of various religious segments. Ironically, his own Taweelat are quiet a match to those of mystics.
Syed Ahmed Khan’s allegiance to British is no hidden secret. He openly declared them his master and often counted their Ahsan (احسانات) on betterment of Muslim society. He stated that it’s the will of Allah that British became masters over us, and since they give us religious freedom and rule with justice, we must action their rule and become loyal and obedient to them. He stated that British rule in India is mercy of Allah on Muslims for which they must thank Allah. It is our religious obligation that we accept obedience of Hon Queen with our heart and lives, and pray for their longevity their government and wealth (1897). He stated that British rule is in our best interest, and British government can keep as much military in India as it needs to sustain its rule. And it is my wish that British rule in India is not temporary but eternal. He declared that is its haram to make fight (jihad) with British rule. When he establish Aligarh University he added as main goal and objective of university is to “prepare
Muslims of India for good services of British Empire and sincere citizen by creating such sincerity in their nature that is achieved by being grateful of excellent services provided by government rather than being obedient
of Occupied State by external empire.”
Syed Ahmed eventually created a new religious philosophy and called it Naturalist, and rejected anything that goes against his definition of Human Nature, and he used god’s will to propagate obedience and sincerity for invading masters. For his loyalty and services for British Empire, Syed Ahmed Khan was knighted in 1888.
By reading Syed Ahmed Khan’s view on Quran and Shariah one can easily conclude that he did not receive proper education in Shariah and he based his views mainly on his personal opinions and surrounding political environment in Indian subcontinent and his own personal political objectives. He openly rejected hadith (حديث) and Tafsir (تفسير). Instead he made Taweel (تعويل) and created his own interpretation of various Nus as he sees fit, often to please the British Masters. But as Allah (swt) says in Quran that if book written by Human you will find contradictions in it, hence, we find many huge contradictions in writing of Syed Ahmed Khan.
Ironically, while he blamed Ulema to make mockery of Hadith and Tafsir by mentioning mysterious things, but Syed Ahmed himself is biggest guilty of this act. His opinions are perhaps worst than any other, and his taweelat is a reminder of Batania sect (فرقة باطنية).
He openly made Taweel (create hidden meaning) to prove his wild opinions. In matters related to Iman and Ghaib (غيب) he denied most of it on pretext that it can’t be proven. He defined Angels as Quwat-Malakuti (قوى ملكوتي) and Devils as Quwat-Bahimi (قوى بهيمي) and denied their physical existence. He stated that true religion has nothing to do with Worldly affairs. Strangely, this unique Ilham (ااـهام) was only given to Syed Ahmed, and Allah (swt) forgot to mention all this wisdom to Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). He denied miracles, and hence denied all miracles associated to various Prophets, like Ibrahim was never put inside fire, and he termed Musa’s stick turning into snake as illusion. He denied that Isa (Jesus) was born without a father.
It was very typical of Syed Ahmed Khan that when he couldn’t explain Quran based on his own presumed Usool (rules), then he will declare that this is رويا (dream) and if it doesn’t fit into dream, then he make Taweel and change the meaning of original word to anything else to make his point. He denied that Jesus was given healing powers and when he gave live to death then death here means Kufr (كفر) and live here mean Iman (ايمان), so Jesus brought them from Kufr to Iman. Or when Allah (swt) showed Ibrahim how he brings dead birds back to live, it was Ibrahim’s dream, and Mohammad (pbuh) was taken to Mairaj (معراج) during his dream etc. He denied that army of Abraha (ابراهه) died after being attacked by birds, rather they died due to smallpox disease. He denied that in Badr Battle Allah swt sent angles to help the Prophet (pbuh). He also denied returning of Jesus.
One would like to ask Syed Ahmed that if for the sake of argument we take his opinion, then we have right to ask that what was stopping Allah (swt) to explain these historical events in same light as Syed Ahmed explains? If Syed Ahmed can explain it then so as Allah (swt). If Jesus was born with father, why would Allah (swt) not say it so in Quran, If Ibrahim was day dreaming, why would Allah (swt) not say so?, if Army of Abraha died of smallpox why would Allah mention that birds (أبابيل) stroked them with stone of hard clay.
Syed Ahmed had his own version of Tawheed. He declared that those who do not believe in God at all are not mushrik (مشرك) and will still go to paradise. He stated that those who do not have religion also have a religion and that is also Islam.
Similarly, he created his own version of fiqh. He denied Nasih and Mansookh (ناسخ و منسوخ) and also denied hadith. He claimed that joining salah (جمع بين الصلاتين) means we can do three daily prayers instead of five. He claimed that facing towards Kaba is not necessary. He considered Ahram (احرام) a barbaric dress of uncivilized times that Mohammad (pbuh) continued in their remembrance. He also denied magic and said word Sahr (سحر) in Quran means jahiliya (جاهليه) of Arabs as they use to believe in magic and such belief was jahiliya (جاهليه). He denied that religion (deen) has any role in worldly affairs. He stated that Haram Riba (ربا) is only when taken from poor people, and stated that taking Riba from riches or well off is not haram, neither it is haram to taken Riba in affairs of state and society, and in general trade.
In Indian subcontinents, there are many opinions about Syed Ahmed Khan. Some in Pakistan considers him pioneer of two nation theory, while other in India considers him pioneer of universalism or global nation. Main reason for such vast variety of opinion on his personality is that his writing that span over sixty or more years contains his personal opinions at a point in time and he continuously changed with time.
This is also true that in Indian sub continents various religions segments were involved in extreme Bidda (بدعات) and they had strange mysterious habits and cultures in various religious circles that have no roots in Islamic teaching. While Syed Ahmed Khan rightfully pointed out many of such mystic activities, he himself fell into other extreme. We acknowledge that many religious circles openly practice mysticism and have large blind following, but this is not a justification of mutilating the meaning and understanding of Quran and join the other extreme. Syed Ahmed justified his Taweelat (تعويلات) by presenting Bidda (بدعات) of various religious segments. Ironically, his own Taweelat are quiet a match to those of mystics.
Syed Ahmed Khan’s allegiance to British is no hidden secret. He openly declared them his master and often counted their Ahsan (احسانات) on betterment of Muslim society. He stated that it’s the will of Allah that British became masters over us, and since they give us religious freedom and rule with justice, we must action their rule and become loyal and obedient to them. He stated that British rule in India is mercy of Allah on Muslims for which they must thank Allah. It is our religious obligation that we accept obedience of Hon Queen with our heart and lives, and pray for their longevity their government and wealth (1897). He stated that British rule is in our best interest, and British government can keep as much military in India as it needs to sustain its rule. And it is my wish that British rule in India is not temporary but eternal. He declared that is its haram to make fight (jihad) with British rule. When he establish Aligarh University he added as main goal and objective of university is to “prepare
Muslims of India for good services of British Empire and sincere citizen by creating such sincerity in their nature that is achieved by being grateful of excellent services provided by government rather than being obedient
of Occupied State by external empire.”
Syed Ahmed eventually created a new religious philosophy and called it Naturalist, and rejected anything that goes against his definition of Human Nature, and he used god’s will to propagate obedience and sincerity for invading masters. For his loyalty and services for British Empire, Syed Ahmed Khan was knighted in 1888.
Sayyid Ahmad Khan [1817-1898]
Diklaim oleh banyak Muslim Pakistan sebagai 'terbesar reformis Muslim (new Age movement) dan negarawan dari abad ke-19' tapi apa yang mengejutkan dari inti Ajaran Agama Sir Syed Ahmad Khan ini, antara lain :
- Dia secara terbuka menolak hadits
- Dia secara terbuka menolak semua Tafsir sebelumnya Quran
- Dia menciptakan penafsiran sendiri yang menyimpang dari Quran
- Ia menyerang para Cendekiawan Muslim
- Dia membantah keberadaan malaikat dan jin
- Dia membantah semua mukjizat disebutkan dalam Quran
- Dia menghubungkan ayah Nabi Isa (jesus)
- Dia juga membantah kembalinya Nabi Isa (Yesus) AS dengan menyatakan ia telah meninggal.
- Ketika ia tidak bisa menjelaskan Quran berdasarkan aturan diduga sendiri, ia akan menyatakan sesuatu menjadi mimpi dan jika itu tidak masuk ke dalam mimpi, ia kemudian akan menggunakan sendiri 'logika' dan mengubah arti dari kata asli untuk apa yang paling sesuai dengan maksudnya.
- Dia membantah bahwa Nabi Isa a.s diberi kekuatan penyembuhan dan ketika ia memberikan hidup kepada orang mati, maka kematian di sini berarti kufur dan hidup di sini berarti Iman, Yesus membawa mereka dari kufur ke Iman.
- Dia membantah bahwa Allah SWT menunjukkan Nabi Ibrahim a.s bagaimana membawa unggas dalam kapalnya, ia mengklaim itu adalah mimpi!
- Dia membantah Nabi Muhammad SAW dibawa ke Miraj fisik dan mengklaim itu hanya mimpi!
- Dia membantah bahwa tentara Abrahah tewas setelah diserang oleh burung, melainkan mereka meninggal karena cacar.
- Dia membantah bahwa dalam Perang Badar Allah SWT mengutus sudut untuk membantu Nabi Muhammad SAW.
- Ia menyatakan bahwa mereka yang tidak percaya pada Tuhan sama sekali tidak kafir dan masih akan pergi ke surga.
- Dia menyatakan bahwa mereka yang tidak memiliki agama juga Muslim.
- Ia mengaku hanya ada 3 sholat bukan 5.
- Ia mengaku tidak perlu menghadapi kiblat shalat selama Ia menilai Ahram gaun barbar kali tidak beradab bahwa Nabi Muhammad SAW terus dalam mengingat mereka.
Dia membantah bahwa agama memiliki peran apapun dalam urusan. Dia menyatakan bahwa riba hanya haram ketika diambil dari orang-orang miskin, dan menyatakan bahwa mengambil riba dari orang-orang kaya atau finansial maju tidak haram, baik itu haram untuk mengambil riba dalam urusan negara dan masyarakat, dan perdagangan umum.
Sayyid Ahmed Khan kesetiaan untuk Inggris ada rahasia tersembunyi. Dia secara terbuka menyatakan mereka untuk menjadi master dan sering dihitung berkat mereka pada kemajuan umat Islam.
Dia menyatakan bahwa itu adalah kehendak Allah bahwa Raj Inggris menjadi tuan atas kami, dan karena mereka memberi kita kebebasan beragama dan memerintah dengan adil, kita harus tindakan pemerintahan mereka dan menjadi setia dan patuh kepada mereka. Ia menyatakan bahwa kekuasaan Inggris di India adalah rahmat Allah pada umat Islam yang mereka harus bersyukur kepada Allah. Ini adalah kewajiban agama kita bahwa kita menerima ketaatan Hon. Ratu dengan hati dan hidup kita, dan berdoa untuk umur panjang pemerintah dan kekayaan mereka (1897). Dia menyatakan bahwa pemerintahan Inggris adalah kepentingan terbaik kami, dan pemerintah Inggris dapat tetap sebanyak militer di India karena kebutuhan untuk mempertahankan kekuasaannya. "Dan itu adalah keinginan saya bahwa pemerintahan Inggris di India tidak sementara tetapi kekal". Dia menyatakan bahwa adalah haram untuk melawan pemerintahan Inggris di India. Ketika ia mendirikan Universitas Aligarh ia menambahkan sebagai tujuan utama dan tujuan universitas adalah untuk saya.
Diklaim oleh banyak Muslim Pakistan sebagai 'terbesar reformis Muslim (new Age movement) dan negarawan dari abad ke-19' tapi apa yang mengejutkan dari inti Ajaran Agama Sir Syed Ahmad Khan ini, antara lain :
- Dia secara terbuka menolak hadits
- Dia secara terbuka menolak semua Tafsir sebelumnya Quran
- Dia menciptakan penafsiran sendiri yang menyimpang dari Quran
- Ia menyerang para Cendekiawan Muslim
- Dia membantah keberadaan malaikat dan jin
- Dia membantah semua mukjizat disebutkan dalam Quran
- Dia menghubungkan ayah Nabi Isa (jesus)
- Dia juga membantah kembalinya Nabi Isa (Yesus) AS dengan menyatakan ia telah meninggal.
- Ketika ia tidak bisa menjelaskan Quran berdasarkan aturan diduga sendiri, ia akan menyatakan sesuatu menjadi mimpi dan jika itu tidak masuk ke dalam mimpi, ia kemudian akan menggunakan sendiri 'logika' dan mengubah arti dari kata asli untuk apa yang paling sesuai dengan maksudnya.
- Dia membantah bahwa Nabi Isa a.s diberi kekuatan penyembuhan dan ketika ia memberikan hidup kepada orang mati, maka kematian di sini berarti kufur dan hidup di sini berarti Iman, Yesus membawa mereka dari kufur ke Iman.
- Dia membantah bahwa Allah SWT menunjukkan Nabi Ibrahim a.s bagaimana membawa unggas dalam kapalnya, ia mengklaim itu adalah mimpi!
- Dia membantah Nabi Muhammad SAW dibawa ke Miraj fisik dan mengklaim itu hanya mimpi!
- Dia membantah bahwa tentara Abrahah tewas setelah diserang oleh burung, melainkan mereka meninggal karena cacar.
- Dia membantah bahwa dalam Perang Badar Allah SWT mengutus sudut untuk membantu Nabi Muhammad SAW.
- Ia menyatakan bahwa mereka yang tidak percaya pada Tuhan sama sekali tidak kafir dan masih akan pergi ke surga.
- Dia menyatakan bahwa mereka yang tidak memiliki agama juga Muslim.
- Ia mengaku hanya ada 3 sholat bukan 5.
- Ia mengaku tidak perlu menghadapi kiblat shalat selama Ia menilai Ahram gaun barbar kali tidak beradab bahwa Nabi Muhammad SAW terus dalam mengingat mereka.
Dia membantah bahwa agama memiliki peran apapun dalam urusan. Dia menyatakan bahwa riba hanya haram ketika diambil dari orang-orang miskin, dan menyatakan bahwa mengambil riba dari orang-orang kaya atau finansial maju tidak haram, baik itu haram untuk mengambil riba dalam urusan negara dan masyarakat, dan perdagangan umum.
Sayyid Ahmed Khan kesetiaan untuk Inggris ada rahasia tersembunyi. Dia secara terbuka menyatakan mereka untuk menjadi master dan sering dihitung berkat mereka pada kemajuan umat Islam.
Dia menyatakan bahwa itu adalah kehendak Allah bahwa Raj Inggris menjadi tuan atas kami, dan karena mereka memberi kita kebebasan beragama dan memerintah dengan adil, kita harus tindakan pemerintahan mereka dan menjadi setia dan patuh kepada mereka. Ia menyatakan bahwa kekuasaan Inggris di India adalah rahmat Allah pada umat Islam yang mereka harus bersyukur kepada Allah. Ini adalah kewajiban agama kita bahwa kita menerima ketaatan Hon. Ratu dengan hati dan hidup kita, dan berdoa untuk umur panjang pemerintah dan kekayaan mereka (1897). Dia menyatakan bahwa pemerintahan Inggris adalah kepentingan terbaik kami, dan pemerintah Inggris dapat tetap sebanyak militer di India karena kebutuhan untuk mempertahankan kekuasaannya. "Dan itu adalah keinginan saya bahwa pemerintahan Inggris di India tidak sementara tetapi kekal". Dia menyatakan bahwa adalah haram untuk melawan pemerintahan Inggris di India. Ketika ia mendirikan Universitas Aligarh ia menambahkan sebagai tujuan utama dan tujuan universitas adalah untuk saya.
mempersiapkan Muslim India untuk layanan yang baik untuk Kerajaan Inggris dan warga tulus dengan menciptakan ketulusan seperti di alam mereka yang dicapai dengan bersyukur layanan sangat baik yang disediakan oleh pemerintah bukannya patuh dari Negara Pendudukan oleh kerajaan eksternal.
Apakah apapun di atas mengingatkan Anda tentang Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani bukan
Syed Ahmed akhirnya menciptakan sebuah filosofi agama baru dan menyebutnya Naturalis. Dia menolak apa pun yang bertentangan definisinya tentang Human Nature, dan ia menggunakan kehendak Allah untuk menyebarkan ketaatan dan ketulusan untuk master menyerang. Untuk loyalitas dan jasanya untuk Kerajaan Inggris, Syed Ahmed Khan dianugerahi gelar bangsawan pada tahun 1888.
Bila anda membaca kitab tafsir Ahmadiyah, isinya ya sama persis dengan pemikiran Ahmad Khan di atas. Mereka memang murid-murid Ahmad Khan. Termasuk penafsiran Yesus sudah wafat. Yang juga saya tulis itu. :D Itu penafsiran Ahmad Khan juga. Orang-orang Ahmadiyah cuma menconteknya saja. Tapi, yang paling kacau adalah mayoritas umat Ahmadiyah, mungkin 99%, tidak tahu bahwa itu adalah penafsiran Ahmad Khan. Mereka menyangkanya asli ajaran Ghulam Ahmad. Coba saja tanya langsung sendiri ke mereka. Kebanyakan umat Ahmadiyah memang awam saja tentang seluk beluk agamanya.
Ajaran Ahmad Khan lainnya lagi yang turut dianut Ghulam Ahmad adalah mengharamkan jihad dengan senjata. Ini bagi Ahmad Khan agaknya instruksi yang berfungsi sementara saja. Supaya umat Islam di India tidak dicurigai dan ditindas oleh pemerintah kolonial Inggris, supaya bisa tetap berkembang dan tidak dipinggirkan. Maklumlah, saat itu masih baru saja terjadi pemberontakan Sepoy dan banyak juga tentara Sepoy beragama Islam yang terlibat. Ajaran anti jihad inilah yang lalu dianjurkan juga oleh Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Celakanya, oleh Ghulam Ahmad dianggap berlaku selamanya. Tidak bersifat sementara sesuai dengan kondisi yang ada, seperti kalau di sini kondisi zaman revolusi 1945 misalnya. Kalau tak diusir dengan senapan tak bakalan penjajah Belanda mau pergi. Belanda saat itu kan ngotot sekali ingin tetap berkuasa di sini. Dan kita sampai sekarang pun tetap terbungkuk-bungkuk menyembah tuan-tuan kebun Belanda kalau tak berjihad dengan senapan pada tahun 1945. Kita tahu sekarang bahwa memang semua pandangan dari Syed Ahmad Khan memang dianut habis oleh Ahmadiyah.
Ajaran Ahmad Khan lainnya lagi yang turut dianut Ghulam Ahmad adalah mengharamkan jihad dengan senjata. Ini bagi Ahmad Khan agaknya instruksi yang berfungsi sementara saja. Supaya umat Islam di India tidak dicurigai dan ditindas oleh pemerintah kolonial Inggris, supaya bisa tetap berkembang dan tidak dipinggirkan. Maklumlah, saat itu masih baru saja terjadi pemberontakan Sepoy dan banyak juga tentara Sepoy beragama Islam yang terlibat. Ajaran anti jihad inilah yang lalu dianjurkan juga oleh Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Celakanya, oleh Ghulam Ahmad dianggap berlaku selamanya. Tidak bersifat sementara sesuai dengan kondisi yang ada, seperti kalau di sini kondisi zaman revolusi 1945 misalnya. Kalau tak diusir dengan senapan tak bakalan penjajah Belanda mau pergi. Belanda saat itu kan ngotot sekali ingin tetap berkuasa di sini. Dan kita sampai sekarang pun tetap terbungkuk-bungkuk menyembah tuan-tuan kebun Belanda kalau tak berjihad dengan senapan pada tahun 1945. Kita tahu sekarang bahwa memang semua pandangan dari Syed Ahmad Khan memang dianut habis oleh Ahmadiyah.
Silakan Anda baca kitab tafsir
Ahmadiyah. Saya kira mesti ada di internet, cari saja sendiri. Isinya akan
banyak yang sama persis dengan pemikiran-pemikiran Ahmad Khan.
Post a Comment